Mobile applications are regarded as one of the most versatile commercial tools. They have become the new norm for establishing consumer interactions. Not only software, but any other service, such as banking, vehicle sharing, or delivery, is bound to have mobile apps for both Android and iOS. Finally, each organization must decide whether a native app is preferable to a hybrid app or a web app. This article will provide the answer and firstly, what are native applications?
Table of Contents
What are native applications?
A native app, often known as a native application, is a piece of software created specifically by developers for use on iOS or Android devices. For instance, developers produce native apps for Android in Java while writing iOS applications in Objective-C or Swift.
Compared to web apps or mobile cloud apps created to be generic across different devices, native applications can offer optimal performance and take advantage of the most recent technology, such as a GPS. Native applications interact with the operating system of the device in a way that makes them speedier and more adaptable than other application kinds. Developers produce a different version of the app for each device if users of different device kinds use the app.
For instance, the HTML5 code for the Facebook application was originally used for mobile web, iOS, and Android. Facebook’s app engineers produced distinct code for iOS since the app was slower for iOS users. Complex tasks, including networking carried out in the background of the main thread or program that controls the UI, can be rebalanced by developers.
iOS vs Android
Apple only uses iOS on its own devices, the iPhone and iPad, and it is created and supported by Apple.
In the world of Apple, the software and the hardware are both under their complete control. This gives them greater control over the functionality of their devices and any mobile apps they have downloaded from the iOS App Store, allowing them to keep a strong user base and market share.
Google created and continues to promote the Android operating system, which is frequently regarded as a more open platform than Apple. Since Android is an open source operating system, many different device manufacturers are free to implement it on their products. Although Google sells a handful of its own products, the majority of Android customers utilize gadgets made by other businesses like Samsung, Huawei, LG, HTC, etc.
Approximately 71 percent of all smartphone usage worldwide in Q1 2021 was on Android, making it the market leader. From 1.8 billion smartphones in September 2015 to over 2.5 billion currently, Android users have increased. Over the next ten years, as more and more people around the world go online, Android will continue to expand. However, that doesn’t necessarily imply you should start by creating for Android.
Apps made for iOS and Android don’t cross over with each other. As a result, native Android apps cannot be run on iOS devices, and vice versa. Even if apps like Snapchat or Instagram, for instance, appear to be extremely identical and function on both phones, they were really created independently.
The benefits and disadvantages of native applications
- Fast and Responsive: Native applications provide users with the quickest, most dependable, and responsive experiences. It’s doubtful that this will alter in favor of online apps.
- Wider device capability is simple to access: Native makes using the camera, microphone, compass, accelerometer, and swipe gestures incredibly simple. Although it’s easier on native, it’s still achievable utilizing the alternatives.
- Match the UI/UX of each app to the platform conventions: If you can successfully match each app’s UI/UX to the platform conventions, you’ll increase the likelihood that your users will be satisfied. Users can feel at home thanks to dozens of UI/UX variations. Native development eliminates the need to make compromises with UI/UX that you hope will be user-friendly across all platforms.
- Several code bases because there are different app versions for different devices
- The price of hiring more developers to create and maintain a code base for every platform
- The time required for multiple builds for various platforms during each new upgrade.
Why should we choose Native apps over Web apps?
1. Native applications operate more quickly
Since mobile native applications are downloaded and kept locally, internet connectivity and bandwidth are not necessary for their fast processing. Additionally, these apps run by using the native programming language and APIs of the device. Thus, they operate more effectively. Web apps, on the other hand, are essentially a collection of web pages connected via browser-based technologies. Although they are HTML-powered user interfaces, they just mimic the appearance and feel of apps. A web app makes calls to external web pages in order to carry out any action. Processing speed is based on the availability of local internet connectivity.
2. They benefit from the App Store
Only native mobile apps are available in app stores. Additionally, app stores are without a doubt one of the most significant marketing platforms for any software. The App Store is generally the first place someone will look when they need a new app. Your app’s chances of being found are higher if it is listed there. There are methods for increasing the visibility of your app in app stores. The majority of consumers view native applications as the standard of excellence since they are supported by App Stores.
Another major plus for native applications is that the App Stores from where they are downloaded handle their monetization (commission, revenue, etc.). Payment methods must be embedded into web apps themselves.
3. Apps with greater security
Native applications can take advantage of the operating system’s built-in security measures on a device. Additionally, native programs can access OS upgrades that improve performance. The mobile device administration functionality enables customers to remotely monitor their app and safeguard its data from intrusion or compromise.
4. There are no problems with scalability or improvement
Native applications may easily and quickly get new functionality. Your app may become better and more scalable thanks to the limitless APIs that are available for native applications. For building functionality that aren’t offered by existing APIs, new APIs can be built if necessary. On the other hand, online apps are only as functional as the web browser that supports them. Consequently, they lack native applications’ flexibility.
5. Satisfactory hardware integration for mobile
Mobile devices come with great capabilities like cameras, GPS, touch screens, built-in calling, and microphones. Using these features is simple in native applications. It can be difficult and laborious to utilize these features within a web browser.
6. Satisfies people’ expectations for UI and UX
Users of native applications are delighted by the UI and UX they have grown accustomed to from their mobile devices. Web apps replicate the appearance of native applications, but not their feel. They are unable to perform as smoothly as native applications. Additionally, web apps rarely provide the amazing user experience offered by native apps due to their boring user interface across all devices.
7. Native apps also function offline
The fact that native apps don’t require the internet to function, unlike web apps, is one of their main advantages. Native apps may be used everywhere, in a desert, a forest, or anywhere else because they are kept on a device. Web apps are hosted on web browsers and can only be used when connected to the internet. As a result, using web apps will be difficult due to fluctuating internet speed, connectivity problems, and high internet usage fees.
Native vs. hybrid apps
Applications that combine native and web apps are called hybrid apps. Although a hybrid app installs like a native software, it functions similarly to a web app internally. Because hybrid applications have access to internal device APIs, they can make use of tools like the camera, storage, and GPS. Examples of hybrid apps are Yelp and Instagram.
With HTML and CSS, developers create hybrid applications. They develop an app using a single codebase, then tweak it slightly for each platform. With a hybrid app compared to a fully native software, there are fewer developers committed to each platform. Through a container or WebView, a browser that can be housed inside of a mobile app, hybrid apps often execute a web application.
Applications that are hybrid perform variously from native apps. Web apps serve as the foundation for hybrid applications, which share their navigational components. A hybrid application also requires an internet connection to function; there is no offline option. In contrast, native apps support offline use.
There aren’t many cost distinctions between native and hybrid programs. Developers need to write code to run both sorts of applications across many platforms. A hybrid application is generally preferred if the native application development period of an application is less than four to six months, as developers can create them more quickly.
Tools for native application development
Apple and Google mostly use the open source programming languages Swift and Java.
For the purpose of creating native apps for iOS, Android, and other platforms that employ C# as their programming language, Xamarin is a cross-platform software development tool.
We hope this post has aided you in understanding the distinction between native apps and other apps. In this blog, we’ve discussed how there are a variety of ways native apps excel above online apps, but there are also a variety of routes you may take your app that each have advantages and disadvantages. You will constantly be forced to make a choice because of some form of time or financial constraint. Prior to beginning construction, it is crucial to give yourself adequate time to consider and calculate.